EFFECT OF COLD STORAGE CONDITIONS ON PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF POTATO TUBERS | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 23, Volume 32, Issue 2, April 2015, Pages 789-806 PDF (911.63 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2015.98640 | ||
| Authors | ||
| M. Darwesh; A. H. Elmetwalli | ||
| Assis. Prof., Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agric., Tanta Univ., Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Post harvest processes of potato tubers are crucially important to keep crop losses at a minimum. Besides stacks dimensions, arrangement of potato stacks within commercial cold stores is one of the main reasons causing storage losses and low potato tubers quality. This research attempted to investigate the influence of storage duration and stacks height on physical properties of two potato varieties (Diamont and Invootar). The cold store was kept at 4-10 oC and 65-70% relative humidity. The results showed that the change rate in length, width and thickness was higher in diamond variety more than Invootar variety at all investigated stacks height. Surface area of potato tubers increased with increasing stacks height and decreased with storage duration. Temperature within the stacks decreased with the treatments at 3 and 6 m stack height that improved potato quality parameters. The results therefore revealed that selecting the optimum potato stacks height can improve the movement of air through stacks and also improve heat transfer within the stack. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| potato; tubers; stack; height; physical; properties; storage | ||
| References | ||
|
Brosnan, T. and D. W. Sun (2001). Precooling techniques and applications for horticultural products- a review. International Journal of Refrigeration, 24: 154 -170.
Chourasia, M. K. and T. K. Goswami (2001). Losses of potatoes in cold storage vis-à-vis types, mechanism and influential factors. Journal of Food Science Technology Mysore, 38 (4), 301-313.
Chourasia, M. K.; P. Maji; A. Baskey and T. K. Goswami (2005).Estimation of moisture loss from cooling data of potatoes. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 28: 397-416.
Chourasia, M. K. and T. K. Goswami (2007a). Steady state CFD modeling of airflow, heat transfer and moisture loss in a commercial potato cold store. International Journal of Refrigeration., 30, 672-689.
Chourasia, M. K. and T. K. Goswami (2007b). Three dimensional modeling on airflow, heat and mass transfer in impermeable enclosure containing agricultural produce during natural convective cooling. Energy Conversion Management, 48: 2136-2149.
Geankoplis, C. J. (1993). Transport processes and unit operation. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India.
Golmohammadi, A. and A. H. Afkari-Sayyah (2013). Long-Term storage effects on the physical properties of the potato. International Journal of Food Properties, 16: 104-113.
Hoang, M.L.; P. Verboven; M. Baelmans and B.M. Nicolai (2004). Sensitivity of temperature and weight loss in the bulk of chicory roots with respect to process and product parameters. Journal of food Engineering, 62: 233-243.
Hu, Z. and D. W. Sun (2000). CFD simulation of heat and moisture transfer for predicting cooling rate and weight loss of cooked ham during air-blast chilling process. Journal of Food Engineering, 46: 189-197.
Mohsenin, N. N. (1986). Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: New York, 742pp.
Nourian, F.; H. S. Ramaswamy and A. C. Kushalappa (2003). Kinetics of quality change associated with potatoes stored at different temperatures. Lebensm. Wiss. U. Technol, 36: 49-65.
Pardo, J. E.; A. Alvarruiz.; J. I. Perez.; R. Gomez and R. Varon (2000). Physical-chemical and sensory quality evaluation of potato varieties (Solanum tuberosum). Journal of Food Quality, 23 (2): 149-160.
Van't Oostar, A. (1999).Storage of potatoes, In: F. W. Bakker-Arkema (Ed.), CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering. ASAE, vol. IV: 93-125.
Verboven, P.; D. Flick; B. M. Nicolai and G. Alvarez (2006). Modeling transport phenomena in refrigerated food bulks, packages and stacks: basics and advances. International Journal of Refrigeration, 29: 985-997. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 290 PDF Download: 525 |
||
