EVALUATION OF SPRAY DISTRIBUTION FOR LOW PRESSURE EMTF NOZZLES | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 7, Volume 27, Issue 3, July 2010, Pages 863-885 PDF (1.42 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2010.105749 | ||
| Author | ||
| E. M. E. Sehsah | ||
| Assis. Prof. in Agric. Eng. Dept., Fac, of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh Univ., Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The full automatic patternometer was used with ultrasonic sensor and compatible software program to measure the spray distribution from different EMTF nozzles under conditions of JKI laboratory in Germany. The goals of present study are measured spray distribution of the EMTF nozzles using the full automatic patternometer single nozzle test, by comparing the distribution profiles of sprays from EMTF nozzles those from standard fan nozzles. As well as investigating to find the optimum combination for EMTF nozzles from the available nozzles in the marketing which may be produced a good uniformity spray distribution. The current investigation research was cared out in the Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry (JKI), Braunschweig, Germany. The full automatic patternometer was adapted at the optimum air conditions, 20° C air temperature and 80 % relative humidity. Eight external mixing twin fluid nozzles were evaluated in a patternometer single nozzle test to compare spray distribution. Each tip was compared at 60 kPa liquid pressure, parallel to a 150 kPa and 200 kPa air pressure for each. Two levels for nozzle height 50 cm and 70 cm, and co-angling 45° and 60° was treated and studied their effect with the interaction of both nozzles and air pressure on coefficient of variation percent. The results indicated that the minimum CV % values for good spray distribution were 10.6 %, 12.9 % and 14.0 % for EMTF nozzle N8, N3 and N7 at 50 cm nozzle height, 45° co-angling and 200 air pressure respectively. The EMTF nozzle N8 produced the CV % nearly the standard ISO nozzle CV percentages values. The uniformity spray distribution CV percent values for N8 (Lechler FT 5–608 & DG800-04 VK) nozzle at the optimum co-angling 45°were 11.0 % and 12.1% at 50 cm and 70 cm nozzle height respectively. As well as, there are non effects of the interaction of air pressures with the all factors on the CV percentage. It may therefore be concluded that the CV % values are more strongly dependant on the combinations of nozzles in the EMTF nozzles, which is highly significant in data. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Spray distribution; Nozzles. Low pressure | ||
| References | ||
|
Alford, J; Miller, P C H; Goulson, D; Holland, J M (1998): ‘ Predicting susceptibility of non- target insect species to different insecticide application in winter wheat.’ Proc Brighton Conf – Pests and Diseases. pp 599 – 604.
Chapple, A C; Downer, R A; Hall F R (1993): ‘Effects of spray adjuvants on swath patterns and droplet spectra for a flat fan hydraulic nozzle.’ Crop Protection, 12. pp 579 –590.
Combellack, J H; Miller, P C H (2001): ‘Effect of adjuvants on spray patternation and the volume of air inducted by selected nozzles.’ Proc Sixth Int Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals. pp 557 – 562.
Czacyk, Z; Kramer, H; Kleisinger, S (2002): ‘Comparison of two abrasive materials for testing nozzle wear.’ Aspects of Applied Biology, 66. pp 457 – 461.
Dorr, G J and Pannell, D J (1992): ‘Economics of improved spatial distribution of herbicide for weed control in crops.’ Crop Protection, 11. pp 385 – 390.
Downer, R A; Ebert, T A; Thompson, R S; Hall, F R (1997): ‘Herbicide spray distribution, quality and efficacy interactions; conflicts in requirements .’Aspects of Applied Biology, 48. pp 79 – 89.
Enfalt, P; Engqvist, A; Alness, K (1997a): ‘Assessment of the dynamic spray distribution on a flat surface using image analysis.’ Aspects of Applied Biology, 48. pp 17 – 24.
Enfalt, P; Engqvist, A; Bentsson, P (1997b): ‘The influence of spray distribution and drop size on the dose response of herbicides.’Proc Brighton Crop Protection Conf – Weeds. pp 381 – 389.
Ford, M G and Salt, D W (1987): ‘The behavior of insecticide deposits and their transfer from plant to insect surfaces.’ In ‘Pesticides on plant surfaces. Critical reports in applied chemistry.’ Ed H Cottrell. John Wiley.
Hagenvall, H (1981): ‘Uneven spraying – effects on yield and weeds.’ Proc 22nd Swedish Weed Conf (Reports). pp 96 – 105.
Herbst, A; Wolf, P (2001): ‘Spray deposit distribution from agricultural boom sprayers in dynamic conditions.’ ASAE Meeting Paper 01 – 1054.
Holland, J M; Jepson, P C; Jones, E C; Turner, C (1997): ‘A comparison of spinning disc atomisers and flat fan pressure nozzles in terms of pesticide deposition and biological efficacy within cereal crops.’ Crop Protection, 16. pp 179 – 185.
Koch, H (1992): ‘Uber die Bedeutung von geratetechnisch determinierten and stochastisch ablaufenden Prozessen des Applikationsvorgangs für Dosierung und Veritelung von Pflanzenschuzmitteln.’ Gesunde Pflanzen, 44. pp 350 – 360.
Koch, H; Weisser, P (1996): ‘Dosierung und Applikationsqualitat bei Verwendung einer Laborspritzbahn in der Prufung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln.’Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzd, 48. pp 176 – 180.
Knott, L (1978): ‘Einfluss horizontaler Spritzgestangeschwankungen auf die Langsverteilung.’ Gesunde Pflanzen, 30. pp 42 – 48.
Krueger, H R; Reichard, D L (1985): ‘Effect of formulations and pressure on spray distribution across the swath with hydraulic nozzles .’Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: Fourth Symposium. pp 113 – 121. ASTM.
Lloyd, G A; Bell, G J; Howarth, J A; Samuels, S W (1988): ‘Rotary atomisers: comparative spray drift study.’ MAFF.
Lund, I; Jensen, P K (2002): ‘Application technology for band spraying: Correlation between liquid band distribution and biological efficacy.’ Aspects of Applied Biology, 66. pp 107 – 114.
Murphy, S D; Miller, P C H; Parkin, C S (2000): ‘The effect of boom section and nozzle configuration on the risk of spray drift.’ Journal of Ag Engineering Research, 75. pp 120–137.
Nilars, M S (2002): ‘Some nozzle performance considerations when using wide booms at higher spraying speeds.’ Aspects of Applied Biology, 66. pp 95 – 106.
Nordbo, E; Taylor, W A (1991): ‘The effect of air assistance and spray quality (drop size) on the availability, uniformity and deposition of spray on contrasting targets.’ BCPC Mono 46. pp 113 – 124.
Nordbo, E (1992): ‘Effects of nozzle size, travel speed and air assistance on deposition on artificial vertical and horizontal targets in laboratory experiments.’ Crop Protection, 11. pp 272 – 278.
Ozkan, H E; Reichard, D L and Sweeney, J S (1992a): ‘Droplet size distribution across the fan patterns of new and worn nozzles.’ Trans of the ASAE, 35 (4). pp 1097 – 1102.
Ozkan, H E; Reichard, D L and Ackerman, K D (1992b): ‘Effect of orifice wear on spray patterns from fan nozzles.’ Trans of the ASAE, 35 (4). pp 1091 – 1096.
Richards, M D; Hislop, E C and Western, N M (1997): ‘Static and dynamic patternation of hydraulic pressure nozzles.’ Aspects of Applied Biology, 48. pp 201 – 208.
Richardson, R G; Combellack J. H and Andrews, L (1985): ‘Evaluation of a spray nozzle patternator.’ Crop Protection, 5. pp 8 – 11.
Richardson, B; Schou, W C and Kimberley, M O (2000): ‘Defining acceptable levels of spray deposit variation from aerial herbicide applications. ’ASAE Meeting Paper 00 –1054.
Ringel, R; Taylor, W A and Andersen, P G (1991): ‘Changing spray deposits from horizontal to vertical surfaces at ground level within cereal rows using air assistance. ’BCPC Mono 46. pp 297 – 298
Sehsah E.M.E. and S. Kleisinger (2009): Study of some parameters effect on spray uniformity distribution pattern. Misr J.Ag.Eng., 26 (1): -
Sehsah E.M.E. and S. Ganzelmeier (2010): Comparison study on Low Pressure EMTF Nozzles based on Droplets Size Characteristics, Misr J.Ag.Eng., 27 (2): -
Sinfort, C and Herbst, A (1996): ‘Evaluation of the quality of spray distribution from boom sprayers in practical conditions.’ EPPO Bull 26. pp 27 – 36. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 141 PDF Download: 244 |
||
