Evaluation Of Using Different Adjuvants Used For Preparation Of Staphylococcus Aureus Mastitis Vaccine On The Immune Response | ||
| Journal of Applied Veterinary Sciences | ||
| Article 2, Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 9-17 PDF (833.96 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/javs.2021.140065 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ebtsam E.Z. Kotb* 1; Amal M. EL Sawah2; Laila E. Kortam1; Ola A. Abd El Fattah3; Waleed M. Barghooth2 | ||
| 1Animal Reproduction Research Institute (ARRI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt. | ||
| 2Central Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics , Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt. | ||
| 3Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Giza lab., Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was the most prevalent bacteria recorded from clinical and subclinical mastitis. The main objective of the present work is to prepare and evaluate the effectiveness of locally prepared inactivated S. aureus vaccine using different adjuvants Montanide ISA-206, Montanide ISA-70 and alum hydroxide gel for detection of cellular and humeral immune responses. Seventy dairy heifers in the last trimester of gestation divided into (5) groups. Twenty pregnant cows in three groups (G1, G2, and G3) were inoculated intramuscularly with the prepared vaccines four weeks prior to calving then a booster dose at two weeks pre-expected calving. The animals in remaining groups (G4 and G5) were considered as control and safety test respectively. Serum samples from vaccinated and non-vaccinated cows were collected at the 1st and 2nd immunization then at 0, 1, 2, 3 months and (7, 10, 14) days post calving and vaccination and evaluated immunologically using ELISA and Lymphocyte transformation assay, respectively. The results revealed that a progressive increase of immune response in the vaccinated groups (G1 and G2) than that of the third and control groups. These results could be indicated the safety and effectiveness of the Montanide ISA-206, ISA-70 vaccines than alum adjuvant vaccine that reduce the incidence and severity of clinical cases of mastitis. Hence, further studies should be done to elucidate the possibility of field application. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Adjuvant; mastitis; Staphylococcus aureus; vaccine | ||
| References | ||
|
AL-ANBARI, N.N., ALKASS, J.E. AND AL-RAWI, A.A. .2006. California mastitis test as dependant and independent variable in Holstein cows. The 2nd International Scientific Congress for Environment, South Valley University, Egypt.
AMER, S., GÁLVEZ, F. L. A., FUKUDA, Y., TADA, C., JIMENEZ, I. L., VALLE, W. F. M., & NAKAI, Y. 2018. Prevalence and etiology of mastitis in dairy cattle in El Oro Province, Ecuador. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 17-0504.
ASFOUR A.E.; ABEER M. ANWER, A.M. NABEEH AND ABEER E. EL-METWALLY. 2016. Some studies on Pasteurella multocida as a causative agent of mastitis in dairy cows and ewes. Assiut Vet. Med. J. Vol. 62 No. 150, 143-156.
BLOWEY R AND EDMONDSON P. 2010. Mastitis control in dairy herds. 2nd ed. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
BRADLEY, A.J., BREEN, J.E., PAYNE, B., WHITE, V. AND GREEN, M.J. 2015. An investigation of the efficacy of a polyvalent mastitis vaccine using different vaccination regimens under field conditions in the United Kingdom. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 1706-1720.
BROKER, B. M., MROCHEN, D., & PETON, V. 2016. The T cell response to Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens, 5, 31.
BRITISH VETERINARY PHARMACOPOEIA 1993. The Pharmaceutical Press, London
CABAÑAS, R., CALDERÓN, O., RAMÍREZ, E., FIANDOR, A., CABALLERO, T., HEREDIA, R. 2018. Sensitivity and specificity of the lymphocyte transformation test in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms causality assessment. Clin. Exp. Allergy 48, 325–333. doi: 10.1111/cea.13076
CHIN, J.; TURNER, B.; BARCHIA, I. AND MULLBACHER, A. 2000. Immune Response to orally consumed antigens and probiotic bacteria. Immunol. Cell Biol., 78 [1], 55-66.
DHAWAN, A., BAJPAYEE, M., & PARMAR, D. 2009. Comet assay a reliable tool for the assessment of DNA damage in different models. Cell Biology and Toxicology, 25, 5–32.
FERRONATTO J.A., MARLA SCHNEIDER, LINDOMAR F. PESSOA, MAIARA G. BLAGITZ, MARCOS B. HEINEMANN, ALICE M. M. P. DELLA LIBERA AND FERNANDO N. SOUZA 2018. Diagnosing mastitis in early lactation: use of Somaticell , California mastitis test and somatic cell count. Italian Journal OF Animal Science.VOL. 17, NO. 3, 723–729.
GAMAL, W. M., SOLIMAN, E. M. M., & EL-MANZALAWY, M. A. 2014. Tracing the antibody mediated acquired immunity by Foot and Mouth disease and Rift Valley Fever combined vaccine in pregnant ewes and their lambs. Veterinary World, 7(11).
GENGHINI1,R. I TIRANTI, E BRESSÁN, E ZAMORANO-PONCE, J FERNÁNDEZ, F DULOUT 2006. Determination of genotoxicity of classical swine fever vaccine in vitro by cytogenetic and comet tests. 21(3):213-7.
HOGAN, J.S., CANNON, V.B., SMITH, K.L., RINEHART, C.AND , MILLER, S. 2005. Effects of adjuvants on safety and efficacy of an Escherichia coli J5 bacterin. J Dairy Sci, 88 (2): 534-542.
HOQUE MN, DAS ZC, TALUKDER AK, ALAM MS, AND RAHMAN ANMA 2015. Different screening tests and milk somatic cell count for the prevalence of subclinical bovine mastitis in Bangladesh. Trop Anim Health Prod 2015; 47:79–86.
ISMAIL, Z. B. 2017. Mastitis vaccines in dairy cows: Recent developments and recommendations of application. Veterinary world, 10(9), 1057.
KOTB, E. E. Z. 2008. Some studies on the immune response of lactating bovine mammary gland to different mastitic vaccines. Theises of PhD degree in vet. Med.Sci. Cairo Univ.
LEE S AND NGUYEN MT. (2015): Recent advances of vaccine adjuvants for infectious diseases. Immune Network ;15(2):51-57.
LEITNER G., YADLIN, B., GLICKMAN, A., CHAFFER, M. AND SARAN, A. 2000. Systemic and local immune response of cows to intramammary infection with staphylococcus aureus. Res. Vet. Sci., 69: 181–184.
LINDBLAD EB. 2004. Aluminium compounds for use in vaccines. Immunol Cell Biol; 82: 497-505.
LOCHMATTER, P., ZAWODNIAK, A., AND PICHLER,W. J. 2009. In vitro tests in drug hypersensitivity diagnosis. Immunol. Allergy Clin. North Am. 29, 537–554.
MALETIĆ, J.; DJELIĆ, N.; RADAKOVIĆ, M.; MALETIĆ, M.; LAKIĆ, N.; KUKOLJ, V; ALEKSIĆ, N.; ANDJELKOVIĆ, M. AND STANIMIROVIĆ, Z. 2015. Evaluation of DNA damage in rat lymphocytes expose to tulathromycin in vitro. Genetika, 47, (1): 339-438.
MELLA, A., ULLOA, F., VALDÉS, I., OLIVARES, N., CEBALLOS, A., & KRUZE, J. 2017. Evaluation of a new vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy herds of southern Chile. I. Challenge trial. Austral journal of veterinary sciences, 49(3), 149-160.
MIDDLETON JR, MA J, RINEHART CL, TAYLOR VN, LUBY CD AND STEEVENS BJ. 2006. Efficacy of different Lysigin™ formulations in the prevention of Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infection in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Research, 73 10– 19.
MOREIN B, HU KF AND ABUSUGRA I. 2004. Current status and potential application of ISCOMs in veterinary medicine. Advanced Drug Delivery Review, 56: 1382-1382.
MPATSWENUMUGABO, J. P., BEBORA, L. C., GITAO, G. C., MOBEGI, V. A., IRAGUHA, B., KAMANA, O., & SHUMBUSHO, B. 2017. Prevalence of subclinical mastitis and distribution of pathogens in dairy farms of Rubavu and Nyabihu districts, Rwanda. Journal of veterinary medicine.
O. I. E,. 2013. Manual of Diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. World Organisation for Animal Health, 1185, 1191. Chapter 1.1.9 Tests for sterility and freedom from contamination of biological materials.
OPDEBEECK, J.P. AND NORCROSS, N.L. L984. Comparative effect of selected adjuvants on the response in the bovine mammary gland to staphylococcal and streptococcal antigens. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 6, 34l–35l.
PELLEGRINO M, GIRAUDO J, RASPANTI C, ODIERNO L AND BOGNI C. 2010. Efficacy of immunization against bovine mastitis using a Staphylococcus aureus avirulent mutant vaccine. Vaccine, 28 4523 –4528.
PEREIRA, U.P., OLIVEIRA, D.G.S., MESQUITA, L.R., COSTA, G.M. AND PEREIRA, L.J. 2011. Efficacy of Staphylococcus aureus vaccines for bovine mastitis: A systematic review. Vet. Microbiol., 148: 117-124
PÉREZ, M.M., PRENAFETA, A., VALLE, J.,PENADÉS, J., ROTA, C., SOLANO, C., MARCO, J., GRILLÓ, M.J., LASA, I., IRACHE, J.M., MAIRA-LITRAN, T., JIMÉNEZ-BARBERO, J., COSTA, L., PIER, G.B., ANDRÉS, D. AND AMORENA, B. 2009. Protection from Staphylococcus aureus mastitis associated with poly- N-acetyl beta-1,6 glucosamine specific antibody production using biofilm embedded bacteria. Vaccine, 27(17): 2379-2386.
QUINN, P.J.; MARKEY, B.K.; CARTER, M.E.; DONELLY, W.J. AND LEONARD, F.C. 2003. Veterinary Microbiology and Microbial Disease. Can Vet J., 44 (12): 986.
RAINARD, P., FOUCRAS, G., FITZGERALD, J. R., WATTS, J. L., KOOP, G., and MIDDLETON, J. R. 2018. Knowledge gaps and research priorities in Staphylococcus aureus mastitis control. Transboundary and emerging diseases, 65, 149-165.
SAN MARTÍN B, KRUZE J, MORALES MA, AGÜERO H, AND LEÓN B. 2002. Bacterial resistance of mastitis pathogens isolated from dairy cows in the Vth Region, Metropolitan Region, and Xth Region, Chile. Arch Med Vet 34, 221-234.
SAVOJI, M. A., HAGHIGHAT, S., MIRZAEE, M., GOLKARAN, B., MIRZAEE, R., ESFANDIARI, B., and MAHDAVI, M. 2019. Formulation of HBs antigen in Montanide ISA266 shows superiority to commercial HBsAg vaccine in the induction of humoral immune responses. Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 12(4), 292.
SAYED, M.L., SHELL, W.S., HANAN, A. AHMED, HANAN, M. IBRAHIM, NASR, E.A. AND ALI, A.M. 2015. Efficacy of a locally prepared bovine mastitis vaccine. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2: 309-318.
SCHALM OW, NOORLANDER DD. 1957. Experiments and observations leading to development of the California Mastitis Test. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 130:199–204
SCHUKKEN, Y. H., GÜNTHER, J., FITZPATRICK, J., FONTAINE, M. C., GOETZE, L., HOLST, O., & SMITH, D. G. E. 2011. Host-response patterns of intramammary infections in dairy cows. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 144(3-4), 270-289.
SCHUKKEN, Y.H., BRONZO, V., LOCATELLI, C., POLLERA, C., ROTA, N., CASULA, A., TESTA, F., SCACCABAROZZI, L., MARCH, R., ZALDUENDO, D., GUIX, R. AND MORONI, P. 2014. Efficacy of vaccination on Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-neg-ative Staphylococci intramammary infection dynamics in 2 dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci., 97 : 5250-5264.
SHITANDI, A. AND KIHUMBU, G. 2004. Assessment of the California mastitis test usage in small holder dairy herds and risk of violative antimicrobial residues. J. Vet. Sci. 5: 5-9.
SINGH, N.P., MCCOY, M.T., TICE, R.R. AND SCHNEIDER, E.L. 1988. A simple technique for quantification of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res., 175: 184.
SNEDECOR,G.W. AND COCHRAN,W.G.(1982): Statistical methods. 7th Edition,TheIowa State University Press, Iowa
SULEIMAN, T. S., KARIMURIBO, E. D., & MDEGELA, R. H. 2018. Prevalence of bovine subclinical mastitis and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of major mastitis pathogens isolated in Unguja island of Zanzibar, Tanzania. Tropical animal health and production, 50(2), 259-266.
THAKER HC, BRAHMBHATT MN AND NAYAK JB. 2013. Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus from milk and milk products and their drug resistance patterns in Anand, Gujarat, Vet World 6(1):10-13.
TEENA MOHAN, PRIYANKA VERMA & D. NAGESWARA R.A.O. 2013. Novel adjuvants & delivery vehicles for vaccines development: A road ahead Indian J Med Res 138, November 2013, pp 779-795.
TONG C., WU, Z., YU, L., FAN, Z., CHEN,L., HU, R., MA, J., SONG, B., ZHU, Z. AND CUI, Y. 2014. Development of an indirect ELISA for detection of E. coli antibodies in cow serum using a recombinant OmpT as antigen. J. Immunoassay Immunochem. 35(3): 241-255.
WANG X, MENG J, ZHANG J, ZHOU T, ZHANG Y, YANG B, ET AL. 2012. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from powdered infant formula milk and infant rice cereal in China. Int. J Food Microb.;153:142–7.
WATSON, D.L. 1992. Vaccination against experimental staphylococcal mastitis in dairy heifers. Res. Vet. Sci., 53:346.
WATSON, D.L., MCCOLL, M.L. AND DAVIES, H.I. 1996. Field trial of a staphylococcal mastitis vaccine in dairy herds: clinical, subclinical and microbiological assessments. Aust. Vet. J., 74: 447–450. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 594 PDF Download: 758 |
||
