EVALUATION OF 5.5mm INTRABONY IMPLANTS’ SUCCESS FOR PROSTHETIC TREATMENT OF ATROPHIC MANDIBULAR RIDGE (CLINICAL TRIAL) | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 10, Volume 46, Issue 3, December 2021, Pages 65-71 PDF (1.06 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2020.50159.1125 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Fady Michel Tadros* 1; Marwa Gamal Noureldin2; Sameh Darwish3 | ||
| 1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt | ||
| 2Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexanderia University, Alexanderia , Egypt | ||
| 3Oral and Maxillofacial department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University , Alexandria , Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Introduction: Atrophic mandibular jaws have been challenging to treat, using long implants. Techniques as jaw ridge augmentations, mandibular canal lateralization, and osseous distraction were proposed to allow the insertion of long Implants. However, complications as nerve injuries, tissue morbidity and prolonged healing have been inconvenient. Therefore, short implants with advanced surface treatments have been suggested. Objectives: Evaluation of short implants’ success for teeth replacement in atrophic mandibular ridges, loaded by either single or splinted screw retained crowns. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was done on 16 Patients with missing posterior teeth, with 6-8 mm of crestal height above the mandibular canal, and at least 7mm of bone width. Group A: 8 patients received 2 short implants loaded by splinted crowns. Group B: 8 patients received single short implants loaded by single crowns. Osstell and CBCts were used for implant stability and bone condition assessment. Results: Both groups maintained high implant stability with a mean of (68.79±4.61) for group A and (71.71±3.55) for group B, 6 months postoperative. Mean marginal bone loss for group A and group B was (0.11±0.04) and (0.16±0.10) respectively; however the difference is insignificant with P value 0.535. A remarkable increase in bone density for both groups among the follow up time with P value Conclusions: Short Implant is a useful solution for teeth replacement in atrophic posterior mandibular ridges, with an 87.5% of success recorded. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Short Implants; Splinted short Implants; Atrophic mandible; Crown-Implant ratio | ||
| References | ||
|
Kumar TA, Naeem A, Verma AK, Mariyam A, Krishna D, Kumar PK. Residual ridge resorption: The unstoppable. Int J Appl Res. 2016;2:169-71.
Hagi D1, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or =7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol. 2004;75:798-804.
Glantz PO, Nilner K. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic implantbone reconstructions. Periodontol 2000. 1998;17:119-24.
Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: A 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7:104-10.
Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:22-31.
Al-Hashedi AA, Taiyeb Ali TB, Yunus N. Short dental implants: an emerging concept in implant treatment. Quintessence Int 2014;45:499-514.
Al-Hashedi AA, Talyeb Ali TB, Yunus N. Short dental implants: An emerging concept in implant treatment. Quintessence Int. 2014;45;499-514.
Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: A multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1340-7.
Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17:126-31.
Anitua E, Tapia R, Luzuriaga F, Orive G. Influence of implant length, diameter and geometry on stress
distribution: A inite element analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30:89-95.
Monje A, Fu JH, Chan HL, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Catena A, et al. Do implant length and width matter
for short dental implants (
Tawil G, Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:894-901.
Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on
implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:254-62.
Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Santiago JF Júnior, Almeida DAF, Batista VES, Noritomi PY, et al. Retention system
and splinting on morse taper implants in the posterior maxilla by 3D finite element analysis. Braz Dent
J. 2018;29:30-5.
Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, et al. Long-term evaluation of
nonsubmerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359
implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:161-72.
Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, et al. The use of reduced
healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acidetched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials
on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:144-53.
Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior
partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1340-7.
AnnibaliS,CristalliMP,Dell'AquilaD,BignozziI,LaMonacaG,PilloniA.Shortdentalimplants:asystematic
review. J Dent Res. 2012;91:25-32.
Friberg B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous
mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:184-9.
Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström C, et al. Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:639-
45.
Amato F, Polara G. A prospective evaluation of a novel implant designed for immediate loading. Int J
Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34:43-9.
Winwood K, Zioupos P, Currey JD, Cotton JR, Taylor M. The importance of the elastic and plastic components
of strain in tensile and compressive fatigue of human cortical bone in relation to orthopaedic biomechanics. J
Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2006;6:134-41.
Haider R, Watzek G, Plenk Jr H. Histomorphometric analysis of bone healing after insertion of IMZ-1 implants
independent of bone structure and drilling method. Z Stomatol. 1991;88:507-21.
Bashutski JD, D'Silva NJ, Wang HL. Implant compression necrosis: current understanding and case report. J
Periodontol. 2009;80:700-4.
Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross O, Priel I, Gross M, Chaushu G. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height
space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:1934- 9.
Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:707-14.
Fanuscu MI, Chang TL, Akça K. Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:2487-91.
Meyer U, Joos U, Mythili J, Stamm T, Hohoff A, Fillies T, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of the implant/bone interface of immediately loaded dental implants. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1959-67.
Lemos CAA, Verri FR, Santiago JF Júnior, Almeida DAF, Batista VES, Noritomi PY, et al. Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis. Braz Dent J. 2018;29:30-5.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 238 PDF Download: 509 |
||
