Mohammed, Y. (2021). Community-Engaged Arts as a Tool For Social Change. A Case Study on the City of Philadelphia Mural Arts Program. test, 11(4), 359-367. doi: 10.21608/idj.2021.181158
Yara Khaled Mohammed. "Community-Engaged Arts as a Tool For Social Change. A Case Study on the City of Philadelphia Mural Arts Program". test, 11, 4, 2021, 359-367. doi: 10.21608/idj.2021.181158
Mohammed, Y. (2021). 'Community-Engaged Arts as a Tool For Social Change. A Case Study on the City of Philadelphia Mural Arts Program', test, 11(4), pp. 359-367. doi: 10.21608/idj.2021.181158
Mohammed, Y. Community-Engaged Arts as a Tool For Social Change. A Case Study on the City of Philadelphia Mural Arts Program. test, 2021; 11(4): 359-367. doi: 10.21608/idj.2021.181158

Community-Engaged Arts as a Tool For Social Change. A Case Study on the City of Philadelphia Mural Arts Program

International Design Journal
Article 29, Volume 11, Issue 4 - Serial Number 41, July and August 2021, Pages 359-367    PDF (2.23 M)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/idj.2021.181158
Author
Yara Khaled Mohammed
Teaching Assistant Badr University in Cairo BUC
Abstract
This Study Aims to illuminate the correlation between civic engagement and community-engaged arts. As art and politics often correlate to each other, in the early 1990's "new genre public art" has developed out of the previous traditional public art movements with decoration purposes (Lacy, 1995). These New genres have functioned as social intervention channels. this essay will carry out the study of the correlation between the new socio-political phenomenon and public art practices as: (participatory art, dialogic art, community-based art, activist art). Using Art-based research methodology the researcher intends to investigate contemporary community-based art practices and its contribution to local communities’ development. A case study on the city of Philadelphia’s Mural Arts Program is carried out in this research. 
Keywords
Community-based art; Art for Social Change; Creative Activism; Community murals; Site-specific art; Public Art; Art and civic engagement
References
    1. Anderson, D. M. (1961). Elements of Design. Canada: Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
    2. Calo, C.G.  (2012) From Theory to Practice: Review of the Literature on Dialogic Art, Public Art Dialogue, 2:1, 64-78, DOI: 10.1080/21502552.2012.653236.
    3. Cartiere, C. & Zebracki, M. (2016). The everyday practice of public art: art, space, and social inclusion. London; New York : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
    4. Duncombe, S. (2016). Does it Work?: The Effect of Activist Art. Social Research: An International Quarterly 83(1), 115-134. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/620873.
    5. Fleming, R.L. (2007) The art of peacemaking: Interpreting community through public art and urban design. London: Merrill Pub. Ltd.
    6. Golden, J., Rice, R., & Kinney, M. Y. (2002). Philadelphia murals and the stories they tell.  Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    7. Gyekis, G. (2009) Community murals as process for engagement, case studies in urban and rural Pennsylvania. Undergraduate honors thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.
    8. Helguera, P. (2011). Education for Socially Engaged Art. New York: Jorge Pinto Books.
    9. Higher Ground Harlan County Higher Ground (2018). 2018 Mural Fest participants. Available at: https://www.highergroundinharlan.com/muralfest2019.html (Accessed: 2 March 2020).
10. Holler, J.T. (2019). Reintegration, Community Building, and Revitalization: An Examination of the Community Arts and Reintegration Project. The Prison Journal 2019, Vol. 99(4S) 118S–134S.

  1. https://www.muralarts.org/artworks/migrant-imaginary/ (Accessed: 4/3/2020).
  2. https://www.muralarts.org/artworks/tribute-to-herman-wrice/ (Accessed: 3/3/2020).
  3. Keller, S. T. (2014). ENACTING COMMUNITY THROUGH THE ARTS. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. University of north Texas.
  4. Kester, G. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community & communication in modern Art. California University of California Press,
  5. Knight, C. K. (2011). Public Art: Theory, Practice and Populism. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.
  6. Lacy, S. (1995) Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art, Seattle, WA.: Bay Press.
  7. Moss, K. L. (2010). Cultural representation in Philadelphia murals: Images of resistance and sites of identity negotiation. Western Journal of Communication, 74,372-395.
  8. Mullinax, M.(2012).  IT’S ABOUT BEING A RESIDENT OF A PLACE: A CASE STUDY OF PRACTICING CIVIC ENGAGEMENT THROUGH COMMUNITY-BASED ART AND ORAL HISTORY IN HARLAN COUNTY, KENTUCKY. Doctor of Philosophy thesis. University of Kentucky.
  9. Pilato, N.C. (2016). A PAINTED CONVERSATION: NARRATIVE INQUIRIES IN COMMUNITY BASED ART.  Doctor of Philosophy thesis. The Pennsylvania state University.
  10. Project Row houses (2010) Mission. Available at: http://projectrowhouses.org/about/mission (Accessed: 28 February 2020).
  11. Sengstacke, R. A. (1967-1971) The Wall of Respect. Available at: https://interactive.wttw.com/art-design-chicago/wall-respect (Accessed: 1 March 2020).
    https://www.muralarts.org/news-and-press (2018) (Accessed: 3/3/2020).
  12. Towns, E. J. (2002). Aesthetics of Transformation: The African American Experience of the  Chicago Community Mural Movement, 1967-1970. Doctor of education thesis.   Northern Illinois University.
Weissman, J. B.-R. (2009). On the Wall: Four Decades of Community Murals in New York City   Mississippi: Univ. Press of Mississippi
Statistics
Article View: 1,080
PDF Download: 1,187