Postmodern Feminist Theory and Future Prospects | ||
| International Journal of Childhood and Women’s Studies | ||
| Article 2, Volume 2, Issue 1, January 2022, Pages 20-37 PDF (1.28 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/ijcws.2022.222352 | ||
| Author | ||
| Aliaa Rafea | ||
| Faculty of Women, Ain Shams University, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This paper discusses the fundamental differences that occurred in feminist theory after the emergence of postmodern theories, as instead of dealing with women's issues from a global human rights perspective; there has been a tendency to respect cultural specificities, while retaining the emphasis on the importance of freedom, preservation of humanity and anti-oppression. This trend deals with women as a soft force capable of changing the future of the world. It is more interested in the female style of leadership than in the partial issues of women, which change and multiply according to the nature of each society. This movement is concerned with the future vision in which leaders based on the power of dominance and patriarchal leadership depend on leaders capable of communication and giving, relational leadership i.e. the hope that the leadership style will shift from the vertical to the horizontal method, when women are allowed to express their human being. The oppression of women is linked to a collective consciousness that has been stored throughout history. In this context, woman becomes a symbol of inclusion, motherhood and communication. This maternally feminine style would change the world. Hence, female power is not limited to women, but it is a leadership style that appeared in history when human leaders made pivotal changes such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King, for example. The transition to a new historical stage depends on empowering women to lead and encouraging them to have confidence in themselves and not try to prove their abilities by adopting a dominant and controlling male style. This trend goes beyond paying attention to women's special issues to paying attention to women's discovery of their potential, and relies mainly on deep psychology in the hope of benefiting from this trend in theoretical and applied future studies. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Keywords: feminism; postmodernism; deep psychology; women | ||
| References | ||
|
Abbott, Pamela, Melissa Tyler, and Claire Wallace. 2006. An Introduction to Sociology: Feminist Perspectives. Routledge.
Angha, Nahid, and Sharon Grace Mijares. 2013. A Force Such as the World Has Never Known: Women Creating Change. Inanna Publications and Education Incorporated.
Badran, Margot. 1996. Feminists, Islam, and Nation. Princeton University Press.
Bolatito, A Lanre-Abbas. 2003. “Feminism in the Postmodernist Age.” The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 28 (3): 355.
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. “Writing and Difference. Trans. Alan Bass, Chicago: U.” Chicago Press.
Ebert, Teresa L. 1991. “The ‘Difference’ of Postmodern Feminism.” College English 53 (8): 886–904. https://doi.org/10.2307/377692.
Ford, Thomas H. 2009. “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Motherhood of Feminism.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 37 (3/4): 189–205.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2006. The End of History and the Last Man. Simon and Schuster.
Gamble, Sarah. 2004. The Routledge Companion to Feminism and Postfeminism. Routledge.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Orde. New York, United States of America: Simon and Schuster.
Jewkes, Rachel, Robert Morrell, Jeff Hearn, Emma Lundqvist, David Blackbeard, Graham Lindegger, Michael Quayle, Yandisa Sikweyiya, and Lucas Gottzén. 2015. “Hegemonic Masculinity: Combining Theory and Practice in Gender Interventions.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 17 (sup2): 112–27.
Jung, C G. 1964. “The Meaning of Psychology for Modern Man (1934).” G. Adler & RF C Hull (Trans.), Civilization in Transition, Collected Works 10.
Jung, Carl Gustav. 1995. Memories, Dreams, and Reflections. 1963. Repr., London: Fontana.
———. 2014. Civilization in Transition. Routledge.
Mannheim, Karl. 2013. Ideology and Utopia. Routledge.
Mijares, Sharon, Aliaa Rafea, Dhardon Sharling, Joshua Amponsem & Mary Mallory. 2020. The Power of the Feminine: Facing Shadow Evoking LIght. 1st ed. Cairo: The Human Foundation/ Egypt. https://doi.org/305.4.
Mijares, Sharon G, Aliaa Rafea, Rachel Falik, and Jenny Eda Schipper. 2007. The Root of All Evil: An Exposition of Prejudice, Fundamentalism and Gender Imbalance. Imprint Academic.
Paxton, Pamela, Melanie M Hughes, and Jennifer L Green. 2006. “The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review 71 (6): 898–920.
Paxton, Pamela, Sheri Kunovich, and Melanie M Hughes. 2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33: 263–84.
Phipps, Alison. 2021. “White Tears, White Rage: Victimhood and (as) Violence in Mainstream Feminism.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 24 (1): 81–93.
Rafea, Aliaa. 2000. “The Meanings of Hijab.” In Sadiqi, F.(Main Editor). Feminist Movements: Origins and Orientations. Publications of the Faculty of Letters Dhar El Mehraz.
———. 2014. “The Need of the Resurrection of the Egyptian Feminen Spirit.” International Journal of Gender, Nature and Transformation 1 (1): 14–20.
Sands, Roberta G, and Kathleen Nuccio. 1992. “Postmodern Feminist Theory and Social Work.” Social Work 37 (6): 489–94.
Scott, John. 2006. Sociology: The Key Concepts. Routledge.
Varghese, Thresiamma. 2011. “Women Empowerment in Oman: A Study Based on Women Empowerment Index.” Far East Journal of Psychology and Business 2 (2): 37–53.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,849 PDF Download: 911 |
||
