El Maraghi, S., ElHossainy, R., Samy, M. (2022). Assessment of dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction as fluid responsiveness marker in mechanically ventilated septic patients. test, 3(3), 63-74. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.252809
Sameh El Maraghi; Rania ElHossainy; Mina Samy. "Assessment of dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction as fluid responsiveness marker in mechanically ventilated septic patients". test, 3, 3, 2022, 63-74. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.252809
El Maraghi, S., ElHossainy, R., Samy, M. (2022). 'Assessment of dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction as fluid responsiveness marker in mechanically ventilated septic patients', test, 3(3), pp. 63-74. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.252809
El Maraghi, S., ElHossainy, R., Samy, M. Assessment of dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction as fluid responsiveness marker in mechanically ventilated septic patients. test, 2022; 3(3): 63-74. doi: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.252809

Assessment of dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction as fluid responsiveness marker in mechanically ventilated septic patients

Egyptian Journal of Medical Research
Volume 3, Issue 3, July 2022, Pages 63-74    PDF (676.86 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejmr.2022.252809
Authors
Sameh El Maraghi1; Rania ElHossainy2; Mina Samy1
1Critical care department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Egypt.
2Critical care department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Similar to poly trauma, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke, early identification and appropriate management in the initial hours after sepsis develops improves outcomes. In a patient with septic shock, a fluid challenge will cause an increase in stroke volume; according to the Frank-Starling curve [1].Relative hypovolemia has been described in the setting of septic shock. However, only 50 % of patients with hemodynamic instability are fluid responsive [2]. Purpose: Assessment of Fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic shock patients according to presence of LVOT obstruction and to judge the power of prediction of other hemodynamic parameters. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out on 50 adult mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock. Two sets of measurements were performed before and immediately after volume expansion. Cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), IVC distensibility index (dIVC), LVOT velocity (m/s, Mean and peak pressure gradient (mmHg) were measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Fluid challenge responders were defined as patients whose cardiac output was increased ≥15 %. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared for each predictive parameter. Results: During the study period, LVOT obstruction was found in 18 patients (36 %). Mortality rate at 60 days was found to be higher in patients with LVOT than in patients without LVOT obstruction (75% versus 25%, p < 0.01). Around 90 % of patients with LVOT obstruction were fluid responders versus 60 % from patient without LVOT obstruction (P-value=0.04). IVC distensibility index predicts fluid responsiveness at a cutoff point 17% with a sensitivity 88% and specificity 83 %( p-value < 0.001 and AUC= 0.934) Conclusions: LVOT obstruction in the early phase of septic shock is not rare (more than one third of septic shock patients) and is associated with a high mortality rate. Patients who have LVOT, are more fluid responsive than whom have no LVOT. IVC distensibility index carries important baseline parameters that could predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock
Keywords
Sepsis; dynamic LVOT obstruction; fluid responsiveness; IVC distensibility
References
  1. Hofer CK, Cannesson M (2011) Monitoring fluid responsiveness. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 49:59–65.
  2. Alsous F, Khamiees M., DeGirolamo A, et.al (2000) Negative fluid balance predicts survival in patients with septic shock: a retrospective pilot study. Chest, 2000. 117: p. 1749-1754.
  3. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Hayden D, et al (2006) National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network,., Comparison of two fluid- management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med, 2006. 354: p.2564-2575.
  4. Teboul JL, Monnet X (2008) Prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity. CurrOpinCrit Care 14:334–9
  5. Jhawar MB, B.S., Alpert MA, et al. (2011) Left ventricular outflow tract and mid-cavity obstruction may cause false-positive dobutamine stress echocardiograms. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2011. 12: p. E14.
  6. Shankar-Hari M, P.G., Levy ML, et al; (2016) Sepsis Definitions Task Force: Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA, 2016. 315: p. 775–787.
  7. Panza JA, M.T., Maron BJ. (1992) Development and determinants of dynamic obstruction to left ventricular outflow in young patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation, 1992. 85: p. 1398-1405.
  8. Alvarado Sánchez JI, Amaya Zúñiga WF, Monge García MI. (2017) Predictors to intravenous fluid responsiveness. J Intensive Care Med.
  9. Feissel, M., Michard, F., Faller, J. P. & Teboul, J. L., (2004) the respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med., 2004. 30: p. 1834-1837.
  10. Zhongheng Zhang, Sheng Y. et al,2014 Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Respiratory Variation in the Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Is Predictive of Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2014. 40(5): p. 845-853.
  11. Mohamed Bakry, Randa Ali, mohammed A. Hammoda et al, (2013) respiratory changes in IVC diameter versus pulse pressure variation in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated septic patients, Cairo university.
  12. Elhadidy S, M. Rafeaa, Elazab A. et al (2019) , Dynamic left intraventricular obstruction in patients with septic shock: pathogenetic role and prognostic implications. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care, 2019. 6: p. 424-428.
  13. Chauvet JL, Delastre O, et al. (2015), Early dynamic left intraventricular obstruction is associated with hypovolemia and high mortality in septic shock patients. Crit Care, 2015. 19(1): p. 262.
  14. Morelli A, E.C., Westphal M, Rehberg S, Kampmeier T, et al.(2013) , Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2013. 310: p. 1683-1691
Statistics
Article View: 272
PDF Download: 183