EVALUATION OF FRACTURE RESISTANCE IN ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF DIFFERENT INTRA-ORIFICE BARRIER MATERIALS (AN IN VITRO STUDY) | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Articles in Press, Corrected Proof, Available Online from 20 November 2024 PDF (128.29 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2024.320512.1535 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Hatim Saeed Almutairi* 1; Amr Abdallah2; Salma Genena3 | ||
| 1Division of Endodontics, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry - Alexandria University | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background: Endodontically treated teeth (ETT) are potentially weaker than vital teeth against chewing forces and more prone to fracture. Aim: To evaluate and compare the effect of three intra-orifice barriers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Material and methods: Fifty teeth divided into five groups according to the intraorifice barrier used: (n=10 each): Group I: Cention N, Group II: GC EverX Flow, Group III: GC Fuji LC 2 Gold Label, Group IV: (positive control group) no intra-orifice barrier was placed and Group V: Negative control group, root canal was instrumented and left empty without obturation. All subjects underwent fracture resistance test by universal testing machine. Results: The median fracture resistance values were 988.04 for Cention N, 938.35 for EverX Flow, 1241.19 for GC Fuji LC 2 Gold Label, 954.11 for positive control, and 835.26 for negative control. The range of fracture resistance values (minimum to maximum) for each group was as follows: Cention N (678.53 – 1227.96), EverX Flow (312.55 – 1406.96), GC Fuji LC 2 Gold Label (654.88 – 1440.34), Positive Control (756.04 – 1490.64), and Negative Control (769.04 – 1004.61). The Kruskal-Wallis H test yielded an H value of 9.365 with a p value of 0.053 indicating no statistically significant difference between the five groups. Conclusion: Centon N and GC EverX Flow increased fracture resistance to a certain extent, but showed lower value compared to GC Fuji LC 2 Gold Label. Further studies are needed to support our findings. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Cention N; EverX Flow; GC Fuji LC 2 Gold Label; intra-orifice barrier; fracture resistance | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 75 PDF Download: 122 |
||
