Saad, A., Abbas, F., Elgharabawy, S. (2019). CLINICAL EVALUATION OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM 3D PRINTED RESIN PATTERN DESIGNED USING CAD CAM TECHNOLOGY. test, 44(2), 15-21. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57357
Ahmed S. Saad; Faten S. Abbas; Safyah H. Elgharabawy. "CLINICAL EVALUATION OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM 3D PRINTED RESIN PATTERN DESIGNED USING CAD CAM TECHNOLOGY". test, 44, 2, 2019, 15-21. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57357
Saad, A., Abbas, F., Elgharabawy, S. (2019). 'CLINICAL EVALUATION OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM 3D PRINTED RESIN PATTERN DESIGNED USING CAD CAM TECHNOLOGY', test, 44(2), pp. 15-21. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57357
Saad, A., Abbas, F., Elgharabawy, S. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM 3D PRINTED RESIN PATTERN DESIGNED USING CAD CAM TECHNOLOGY. test, 2019; 44(2): 15-21. doi: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57357

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE CONSTRUCTED FROM 3D PRINTED RESIN PATTERN DESIGNED USING CAD CAM TECHNOLOGY

Alexandria Dental Journal
Article 3, Volume 44, Issue 2, August 2019, Pages 15-21    PDF (336.11 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2019.57357
Authors
Ahmed S. Saad1; Faten S. Abbas2; Safyah H. Elgharabawy2
1B.D.S. Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2Professor of Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria Egypt
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Computer-assisted design, computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) can be successfully applied to the fabrication of removable partial denture (RPD) alloy frameworks and replace laboratory crafting techniques. The CAD/CAM techniques have been widely used for a long time to manufacture dental prostheses. Computer-aided technologies allow more precise and systematic modeling, and could therefore reduce the burdensome steps of both chair-side and laboratory work, saving vital time.
OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to compare between the accuracy of chrome-cobalt removable partial denture frameworks designed and fabricated using CAD/CAM technique with that fabricated using conventional technique
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven maxillary bilateral partially edentulous patients having Class III modification 1 Kennedy classification were selected from those attended to the prosthodontic department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. For each patient, two different cobalt chromium removable partial frameworks were constructed; the first one was fabricated using CAD CAM technique (group A)and the other framework was fabricated using conventional manufacturing technique(group B) and were compared through evaluation of: (1) Guiding plane/plate relation. (2) Accuracy of fit of occlusal rests and major connector.
RESULTS: all removable partial dentures fabricated by CAD/CAM technology showed increased improvement of accurate adaptation of the palatal strap major connector, guiding plane\plate relation and fit of occlusal rest, also it was less time consuming and economic need compared to conventional technique.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of CAD/CAM technology for fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks should be widely applied because of its favorable clinical accuracy.

Keywords
KEYWORDS: Removable partial denture; CAD/CAM; Guiding planes; Chrome-Cobalt powder; Occlusal rests adaptation
References
  1. Azari A, Nikzad S. The evaluation of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototype J. 2009; 15:216-25.
  2. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28:44-56.
  3. Williams RJ, Bibb R, Eggbeer D, Collis J. Use of CAD/CAM technology to fabricate a removable partial denture framework. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96:96-9.
  4. Hughes CW, Page K, Bibb R, Taylor J, Revington P. The custom-made titanium orbital floor prosthesis in reconstruction for orbital floor fractures. Br Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2003; 41:50-3.
  5. Kanazawa M, Inokoshi M, Minakuchi S, Ohbayashi N. Trial of a CAD/CAM system for fabricating complete dentures. Dent Mater J. 2011; 30:93-6.
  6. Rantanen T, Eerikanien E. Accuracy of the palatal plate of removable partial dentures, and influence of laboratory handling of the investment on accuracy. Dent Mater. 1986:2:28-31.
  7. Firtell DN, Muncheryon AM, Green AJ. Laboratory accuracy in casting removable partial denture frameworks. Prothet Dent. 1985; 54:856-62.
  8. Bars by MJ, Schward WD. The qualitative assessment of Cobalt-Chromium Casting for partial dentures. Br Dent J. 1989; 166:211-6.
  9. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28:44-56.
  10. Craig RG, Antony DH, Peyton FA. Dimensional changes in duplicating investment casts. Dent Prog 1961; 2: 39.
  11. Hindles GW. Stress analysis on distal extension partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1957; 7: 197.
  12. Dunham D, Brudvik JS, Morris J, Plummer KD, Cameron SM. A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial prosthesis clasp assemblies. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:323- 6.
  13. Kirkpatrick LA, Feeney BC. A simple guide to IBM SPSS statistics for version 20.0. Student ed. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2013.
  14. Eeirkäinen E, Rantanen T. Inaccuracies and defects in frameworks for removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 1986; 13:347-53.
  15. Ali M, Narin RI, Sherriff M, Waters NE. The distortion of cast cobalt chromium alloy partial denture frameworks fitted to a working cast. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:419-24.
  16. Schwartz IS. A review of methods and techniques to improve the fit of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56:279-83.
  17. Dunham D, Brudvik JS, Morris J, Plummer KD, Cameron SM. A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial prosthesis clasp assemblies. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:323- 6.
  18. Bortun CM, Sandu L, Porojan S. Using of light-curing waxes in the removable partial denture technology. Int Poster J Dent Oral Med. 2007; 9:371.
  19. Juszczyk AS, Likeman PR. A laboratory study of the fit of cast cingulum rests. Quintessence Dent Technol. 1995; 18:133-41.
  20. Barby MJ, Schwarz WD. The qualitative assessment of cobalt chromium castings for partial dentures. Br Dent J. 1989; 166:211-6.
  21. Carek A, Zivko-Babic J, Schauperl Z. Microstructure analysis of base alloys joints. MED, Dublin, Ireland. 2006;340-9.
  22. Stojcevic I, Carek A, Bukovic D, HeSever M. Influence of the partial denture on the articulation of dental and postalveolar Sounds. Collegium Antropologicum. 2004; 28:799-807.
  23. Carek A, Zivko-Babic J, Schauperl Z, Jakovav M. Mechanical properties of Co-Cr welded alloy. J Dent Res. 2010; 89:745.
  24. Zvko-Babic J, Jerolimov V. Metals in dental prosthodontics. Zagreb: Skolska knjiga; 2005.
  25. Horvat ALM, Zvko-Babic J, Ivankovic D, Babic S, Kastelan- Macan M. Anodic sampling and TLC identification of dental alloys. J Planar Chromatogr. 2001; 14:426-9.
  26. Dukes BS, Fields H Jr. Comparison of disclosing media used for adjustment of RPD frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45:380-2.
  27. Diwan R, Talic Y, Omar N, Sadig W. The effect of storage time of removable partial denture wax pattern on the accuracy of fit of the cast framework. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77:375-81.
  28. Parker MH, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Reid DE. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:255-9.
  29. Sato Y, Sato M. Use of a silicone disclosing material in patients with embrasure undercuts. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:135-6.
  30. Samy O. Evaluation of the effect of using free standing resin pattern technique, compared to conventional wax pattern technique, on the dimensional accuracy of cobaltchromium removable partial. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University. 2008.
  31. Rudd RW, Rudd KD. A review of 243 errors possible during the fabrication of a removable: Part I. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:251-61.
  32. Rudd RW, Rudd KD. A review of 243 errors possible during the fabrication of a removable: Part II. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:262-76.
  33. Eggbeer D, Bibb R, Williams R. The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2005; 219:195-202.
  34. Available at: http://www.Envisiontech .com
  35. Hutton JE, Marshall GW. The expansion of phosphatebonded investments: part I-setting expansion, J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70:121-5.
  36. Stern MA, Brudvik JS, Frank RP. Clinical evaluation of removable partial denture rest seat adaptation. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53:658-62.
  37. Williams RJ, Rafik T, Al-Hourani Z. An electronic method for measuring the fit of removable partial denture frameworks to dental casts. J Eng Res. 2009; 6:15-20.
  38. Williams RJ, Bibb R, Rafik T. A technique for fabricating patterns for removable partial denture frameworks using digitized casts and electronic surveying. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91:85-8.
  39. Tamrakar AK, Rathee M, Mallick R, Dabas S. CAD/CAM in prosthodontics - a futuristic overview. A DS; 2014; 2:14-6.
  40. Aeran H, Kumar V, Seth J, Sharma A. Computer aided designing-computer aided milling in prosthodontics: a promising technology for future. Case Report & Reviews. IJSS. 2014; 1:23-7.
Statistics
Article View: 1,973
PDF Download: 3,549