EVALUATION OF STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL GUIDE IN INDIRECT SINUS LIFTING FOR IMPLANT PLACEMENT | ||
| Alexandria Dental Journal | ||
| Article 16, Volume 42, Issue 1, April 2017, Pages 98-103 PDF (853.6 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57866 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Amr Y. Shiha* 1; Abdelaziz F. Khalil2; Riham M. Eldibany2 | ||
| 1Instructor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egyp | ||
| 2Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| INTRODUCTION: Due to the inherent characteristics of the posterior maxillary bone, oral rehabilitation with implants may present some difficulties related to poor quality and insufficient volume of bone due to sinus pneumatization. Maxillary sinus augmentation procedure is currently considered a highly predictable and safe technique that allows the insertion of implants into the atrophic posterior maxilla. The use of CAD-CAM stereolithographic surgical guide during sinus-lift procedure has been advocated for many years. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of stereolithographic surgical stent in transcrestal sinus lifting for implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of fifteen implants were placed in 6 patients. They were selected to perform transcrestal sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement using stereolithographic surgical stent. RESULTS: Merging the preoperative plan and immediate postoperative CBCT images showed statistically significant values of the accuracy. The mean difference of angulation of the inserted implants compared to the angulation projected by the stereolithographic stent was 7.03° ± 4.53°. The mean of total coronal differences was 1.56 mm ± 1.15 mm, while the mean of total apical differences was 1.75 ± 1.14 mm. CONCLUSIONS: For beginners, stereolithographic surgical stent is an acceptable tool for transcrestal sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement especially for single implants. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Transcrestal Sinus lift; stereolithographic surgical stent; accuracy; Implants | ||
| References | ||
|
1. Tsai CY, Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Mori K, Benavides E, Kaigler D, Kapila Y. Implant success remains high despite grafting voids in the maxillary sinus. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):447-53.
2. Calin C, Petre A, Drafta S. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(3):558-76.
3. Erdem NF, Ciftci A, Acar AH. Three-Year Clinical and Radiographic Implant Follow-up in Sinus-Lifted Maxilla With Lateral Window Technique. Implant Dent. 2016;25(2):214-21.
4. Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. Bone suture and lateral sinus lift surgery. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015;19(5):593-4.
5. Esposito M, Cannizzaro G, Barausse C, Cosci F, Soardi E, Felice P. Cosci versus Summers technique for crestal sinus lift: 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(2):129-37.
6. Checchi L, Felice P, Antonini ES, Cosci F, Pellegrino G, Esposito M. Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3(3):221-32.
7. Vico G, Spinelli D, Bonino M, Schiavetti R, Pozzi A, Ottria L. Computer-assisted virtual treatment planning combined with flapless surgery and immediate loading in the rehabilitation of partial edentulies. Oral Implantol. 2012;5(1):3-10.
8. Kocyigit ID, Coskunses FM, Ozgul O, Tuz HH, Kartal Y, Polat M, et al. Evaluation of preoperative model surgery and the use of a maxillary sinus surgical template in sinus floor augmentation surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(6):e606-10.
9. Naziri E, Schramm A, Wilde F. Accuracy of computerassisted implant placement with insertion templates. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016;5(15):84-7.
10.Chasioti E, Sayed M, Drew H. Novel Techniques with the Aid of a Staged CBCT Guided Surgical Protocol. Case Rep Dent. 2015;8(4):39-76.
11. Steflik DE, Koth DL, Robinson FG, McKinney RV, Davis BC, Morris CF, et al. Prospective investigation of the single-crystal sapphire endosteal dental implant in humans: ten-year results. J Oral Implantol. 1995;21(1):8- 18.
12. Yokobe J, Kitahara M, Matsushima M, Uezono S. Preference for different anchor descriptors on visual analogue scales among Japanese patients with chronic pain. PloS One. 2014;9(6):e99-891.
13. Kotz S BN, Read CB, Vidakovic B. . Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. . N.J.: Wiley-Interscience; 2006; 33- 59.
14.Rios HF, Avila G, Galindo P, Bratu E, Wang HL. The influence of remaining alveolar bone upon lateral window sinus augmentation implant survival. Implant Dent. 2009;18(5):402-12.
15. Widmann G, Keiler M, Zangerl A, Stoffner R, Longato S, Bale R, et al. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(5):1140-7.
16. Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Marchetti M, Scarfo B, Esposito M. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(3):229-42.
17.Reyes A, Turkyilmaz I, Prihoda TJ. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(4):295-303.
18. Vasak C, Strbac GD, Huber CD, Lettner S, Gahleitner A, Zechner W. Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(1):142-9.
19. Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1157-63.
20. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20 (4):73-86.
21. Stumpel LJ. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(3):442-53.
22. D'Haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computerdesigned stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(3):321- 35.
23. Pozzi A, Moy PK. Minimally invasive transcrestal guided sinus lift (TGSL): a clinical prospective proof-of-concept cohort study up to 52 months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(4):582-93.
24. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol. 2005;76(4):503-7.
25. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computeraided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(2):234-42.
26. Farley NE, Kennedy K, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computergenerated and conventional surgical guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(2):563-72.
27. Yu JJ, Kim GT, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Paek J, Kim SH, et al. Accuracy of a cone beam computed tomographyguided surgical stent for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(2):275-83.
28.Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli LV, Cavallini C. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(2):264-75.
29.Bruno V, Badino M, Riccitiello F, Spagnuolo G, Amato M. Computer Guided Implantology Accuracy and Complications. Case Rep Dent. 2013;54(9):70-42.
30. Stumpel LJ, 3rd. Cast-based guided implant placement: a novel technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100(1):61-9.
31. Laleman I, Bernard L, Vercruyssen M, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM, Quirynen M. Guided Implant Surgery in the Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(1):s103-17.
32. Van de Wiele G, Teughels W, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Temmerman A, Quirynen M. The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(12):1489-94.
33. Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, Wanschitz F, Truppe M, Seemann R, et al. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34(1):1-8.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 278 PDF Download: 591 |
||
