IDEAL DESIGN OF LOW-HEAD COILED-TUBE IRRIGATION | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 34, Volume 34, Issue 4, October 2017, Pages 2141-2150 PDF (779.38 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2017.96536 | ||
| Authors | ||
| I. H. El-Sheikh1; M. A. Rashad2; A. H. Rabea3 | ||
| 1Prof. of Ag. Eng., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. Ag., Suez Canal Univ., Egypt. | ||
| 2Assoc. Prof. of Ag. Eng., Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. Ag., Suez Canal Univ., Egypt. | ||
| 3Agricultural Engineer, Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. Ag., Suez Canal Univ., Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In low-head tube irrigation, water is applied to the soil surface as a little stream, typically from a small-diameter tube without filtration. The objective of this study were coiling the tube to overcome its lengths problems and developing mathematical model to design the lateral of low-head coiled-tube irrigation with full water application uniformity. Constructing the model include input data under determined operating conditions to get the optimum design. The design model was developed to identify lateral length (Lℓ), coiled-tube lengths (Cℓ) and pressure heads (Ch). by using the input data of lateral inside diameter (LID), coiled-tube inside diameter (CID) and discharge (Cq), tube interval distances (Cs), soil surface slope (%), and water temperature (Tw). The optimum design example was presented to three coiled-tube diameters of 3.8, 5.2 and 6.8 mm under upstream low-head pressure (Lh.a) of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5m for predetermined tube discharges. The results show that the effect of each parameter in the design output. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Low-head; Tube; Lateral; Design; Model; Uniformity | ||
| References | ||
|
Amer, K. H. (2011). Effect of irrigation method and quantity on squash yield and quality. Agric. Water Manag., Elsevier, 98: 1197 - 1206.
Boor, B.; J. Kunstatsky and C. Patocka (1968). Hydraulika Provodohospodarske stavby book, SNTL, Praha, 516 pp. M.S.M. Amin and Z.J. Svehlik1, Hydraulic Analysis of Micro-Irrigation Laterals: A New Approach, Pertanika J. Sci. & Techno2(1): 107-119 (1994).
Demir, V. and E. Uz (1995). The comparison of friction loss equations employed in determining the optimum lateral lengths of drip irrigation systems. Proceedings of the 16th National Agricultural Mechanization Congress, Bursa, Turkey, PP: 441 - 450.
Hull, P.J. 1981. A low pressure irrigation system for orchard tree and plantation Crops. The agricultural Engineer. 55-58.
Lamm, F. R.; J. E. Ayars and F. S. Nakayama (2007). Microirrigation for crop production. design, operation, and management. 13th ed, Italy. Elsevier: 533 - 570.
Ngigi, S. N. (2008). Technical evaluation and development of low-head Microirrigation systems in Kenya. Irrig. and Drain. 57: 450 - 462
Rashad, M. A. (2013). Development a program to optimize design of low-head bubbler irrigation. Misr J. Ag. Eng., 30 (3): 765 – 784.
Rawlins, S. L. 1977. Uniform irrigation with a low head bubbler system. Agriculture and Water Management. Elsevier Co, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Vol 1:167-178.
Watters, G. Z. and J. Keller (1978). Trickle irrigation tubing hydraulics, ASAE Technical Paper No. 78-2015. St. Joseph, Michigan.17p.
Wu, I. P. and H. M. Gitlin (1973). Hydraulics and uniformity for Microirrigation. J. Irrig. and Drain. Eng. Div., ASCE, 99(2): 341 - 346. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 154 PDF Download: 245 |
||
