WATER DISTRIBUTION UNIFORMITY FOR MINI-SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM | ||
| Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering | ||
| Article 6, Volume 33, Issue 3, July 2016, Pages 869-882 PDF (664.65 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2016.97739 | ||
| Authors | ||
| A. M. Zedan1; A. F. Khedr2 | ||
| 1Lecturer of Agric. Eng., Agric. Eng. Dep., Fac. of Agric., Zagazig Univ., Egypt. | ||
| 2Lecturer of Agric. Eng., Agric. Eng. Dep., Fac. of Agric., Suez Canal Univ., Egypt. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The change of world climate and its attendant effect on scarce water resources have further reduced the availability of water for agriculture. Under this circumstance, the use of pressurized irrigation systems can be an option of enhancing the efficiency of water consumption. This study was therefore conducted to evaluate the performance of mini-sprinkler irrigation system and to determine optimum operating conditions that achieve high coefficient of uniformity (CU). An experiment was conducted on the experimental farm of faculty of Agricultural, Suez Canal Univ. Egypt. Four different commercially available makes of mini-sprinklers MSP1, MSP2, MSP3 and MSP4 of different nozzle sizes 0.85, 1.35, 1.5 and 2.0 mm, respectively were tested at 75 cm stake height for their hydraulic performance in terms of pressure-discharge, pressure-wetting diameter and pressure-average precipitation rate of single mini-sprinkler head relationships. The experiment was conducted at six different operating pressures of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 bar. Polynomial equation of the form Q = aP2 + bP + C were developed for all types of four mini-sprinklers to describe the pressure-discharge relationship. On the basis of this relationship MSP4 was found to be superior over other three nozzles. Pressure- wetting diameter relationships was very well established by polynomial type equation of the form WD = aP2 + bP + C and MSP4 was to be superior over other three nozzles. Average precipitation rate was found to be decreases with increase in operating pressure. For all tested operating pressures and nozzle size, the CU increased with increased operating pressure until its maximum at 2.0 bar. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Mini-Sprinkler; Operating Pressure; Nozzle Size; Precipitation Rate and Coefficient of Uniformity | ||
| References | ||
|
Abo-Ghobar, M. A. (2003). A study on selecting the proper applied water under different irrigation systems. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Egypt, 20(3): 320 - 327.
Awady, M. N. and A. H. Gomaa (1996). A sprinkler irrigation-head developed for simplicity and low-pressure operation. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Cairo University Irrigation Conference, 3 - 4 April: 119 - 129.
Christiansen, J. E. (1942). Irrigation by sprinkler. Bulletin 670. California Agricultural Experiment Station. University of California. Berkeley, California.
David, J. H. and G. Yuping (1989). Sprinkler volume mean droplet diameter as a function of pressure. Transaction of the ASAE, 32(1): 481 - 496.
El-Ansary, M. Y.; A. M. El-Gindy; M. A. Awad and E. A. Wasif (2003). Evaluation of the alternate sets management of sprinkler irrigation. The 11th Annual Conference of Misr Society of Agricultural Engineering, 15-16 Oct., 20(4): 236 - 250.
El-Sherbeni, A. M. (1994). Design of sprinkler and drip irrigation systems in newly reclaimed soils. Ph.D. Thesis in Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Egypt, PP: 154.
Ismail, S. M. (2002). Design and management of field irrigation systems. Arabic Text Book, Eldar Elmaref Publishing and Distribution, Alexandria, Egypt, PP: 645.
James, L. G. (1988). Principles of farm irrigation system design. New York: John Wiley and Sons. PP: 545.
Kara, T.; E. Ekmekci and M. Apan (2008). Determining the uniformity coefficient and water distribution characteristics of some sprinklers. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11(2): 214-219.
Kincaid, D. C.; K. H. Solomon and J. C. Oliphant, (1996). Drop size distributions for irrigations sprinklers. Transactions of the ASAE, 39(3): 839 - 845.
Luis, S. Pereira (1999). Higher performance through combined improvements in irrigation methods and scheduling: a discussion. Agricultural Water Management, 40: 153 - 169.
Mandave, V. R. and S. B. Jadhav (2014). Performance evaluation of portable mini-sprinkler irrigation system. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4 (3): 177 - 184.
Melvyn, K. (1983). Sprinkler irrigation, equipment and practice. Batsford Academic and Educational, London. PP: 120.
Seginer, I.; D. Kantz and D. Nir (1991). The distortion by wind of the distribution patterns of single sprinklers. Agricultural Water Management, 19: 341 - 359.
Tarjuelo, J. M.; J. Motero; P. A. Carrion; F. T. Honrubia and M. A. Calvo (1999). Irrigation uniformity with medium size sprinklers part II: Influence of wind and other factors on water distribution. Transactions of the ASAE, 42 (3): 677 - 689.
Vermerein, I. and C. A. Jobling (2004). Localized irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage paper, FAO., Rome, 34 - 22. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 231 PDF Download: 284 |
||
